Google (TM)

Google Talk is all the rage among my computer nerd friends. If you haven’t heard the hype yet (it probably hasn’t spread away from the nerds yet), allow me to enlighten you.
Google Talk is a very simple (watered-down) chat client, similar to the Instant Messengers from AOL, Yahoo, and MSN. It pretty much has only two features: a regular text messaging, and a voice chat (both features that the other clients have had for a long time). It doesn’t even send files.
You might ask, Why do the computer nerds (who should know better) like it, if it’s such a piece of junk? Well, I’ll tell you. You see, the hard-core computer nerds have a very strong bias against Microsoft, and hate everything that they make, even if it’s better than the alternatives. In a similar fashion, they love everything with the brand name “Google”, without regard to whether it’s good or not. Google is just a corporate entity like any other (including Microsoft).
The reason I post this to the non-nerd world is simply that I fear that other people will be blinded by the Google name and fail to see that this particular program is a folly. I think it was silly of Google to make a chat client in the first place. What’s the point of switching to a brand new chat program that no one even has yet? Even if the feature set were better than other IM’s (which it isn’t), don’t you choose your chat based on which one your friends are on?

Posted on August 24, 2005, in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. Google Talk is not folly. It is finally giving legs to the Jabber/XMPP protocols. Another in a long line of tried and true protocols such as HTTP, POP3, IRC, FTP, SMTP. Protocols that almost everyone uses everyday without even knowing it. Plus Google lets you use any Jabber/XMPP client that you want. They encourage it even. Google is even willing to let other IM systems interoperate with theirs from the get go. Google doesn’t need this. They could easily grow a huge user base with out sharing with the other IM networks.Since the Google Talk client is so light weight it takes so few resources so its easy to run it alongside your existing IM clients. Now I just need to find a Jabber client for my phone.

  2. It’s light-weight because it’s light-featured. The only thing on which you could be basing your hypothesis that Google “could easily grow a huge user base [without] sharing with the other IM networks” is that some people will blindly sign on with anything that says “Google.” They certainly aren’t going to win over users based on how good their IM service is.

  3. I think Dan’s right.

  4. Indeed, it seems as though Google is again trying to flex it’s rather deceiving muscle. Though many have ranted and raved in the past (and may continue to do so) that Google’s various offshoots are superior, I know that the downfall of Google will approach. Just like the former sports greats of Ben Johnsen, Brian Bosworth, and Mark McGwire (not Lance Armstrong; all current rumors of Lance’s doping are completely based on rumor, not fact. I would love to see what protocol that stupid lab in France followed. IT better be well documented to hold any credence in the sports world, especially allegations of this magnitude)were all basing their careers on shoddy foundations onlyh to see them unravel before their eyes, so too will Google suffer a similar fate. Soon, the mass of humanity will realize that Google Talk’s supposed strength is simply based on it’s name (not really even it’s name; simply the fact it’s not Microsoft) and not for any legitimate reason. Then, Google’s non-search programs (because Google, the original, truly is awesome) will fade away into the history books as just another passing fad…just like those hypercolor shirts of the early 90’s, T&C surf, and Gecko brand clothes…

Leave a comment